Tuesday, January 4, 2022

 Secular Buddhism and Conceit


A discussion of the word "secular" from the Oxford English Dictionary

There are the main categories in which the word is used sense the word is used in 

  1. of or pertaining to the world
  2. of or pertaining to an age or long period

In the first sense from a religious sense it includes:
  • people not living in monastic seclusion 
  • belonging to the world and its affairs as distinguished from the church and religion; civil, lay, temporal. Chiefly used as a negative term, with the meaning non-ecclesiastical, non-religious or non-sacred
  • of literature, history, art and the writers or artists not concerned with or devoted to the service of religion; not sacred; profane
  • of education, instruction; relating to non-religious subjects - often implying the exclusion of religious teaching from education
  • of or belonging to the present or visible world as distinguished from the eternal or spiritual world; temporal, worldly
  • caring for the present world 
In the second sense it includes:
  • occurring or celebrated once in an age [a period of existence] century or very long period
  • living or lasting for an age or ages

So for me I'm a person of the modern world. I do not live in a monastery and nor do I want to. I'm generally happy in the "secular" world with all its trappings and seductions; food, drink (in great moderation), movies, video games, scuba diving, quilting, etc. I have struggled in my past with internal demons and have, what I consider to be, normal friction with my everyday life, including my almost 35 years of marriage and the father of 2 sons. I do look for guidance on how to be a better person in my explorations of Buddhism as a body of ideas and practices and more recently Greek philosophy or specifically Stoicism. 

 
A discussion of the word "conceit" from the Oxford English Dictionary

  1. after the conceit discussion describe how I might or might not be conceited.
  2. go point by point through Kevin Knox's blog post - especially around my distaste for the Buddha's non-egalitarian stance ... why is this a virtue?